The Engineering Design CK Theory: Contributions and Limits

Eric Coateana, Joelle Forest and Denis Choulier
Additional contact information
Eric Coateana: Department of Engineering Design and Production - Department of Engineering design and Production - TKK - TKK Helsinki University of Technology
Denis Choulier: M3M - Laboratoire Mécatronique 3M - Méthodes, Modèles , Métiers - UTBM - Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbeliard

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The CK theory of design created by Hatchuel and Weil has raised interest and controversies both in the academic community and among practitioners. After presenting the scope and focus of CK theory, and the contributions claimed for it by its creators, we compare it to concepts and models more commonly used in traditional design approaches. It can be noticed that important concepts are ignored by CK theory, even if some of them are integrated into the research programs of Hatchuel, Weil, and Le Masson. This initial analysis demonstrates that even in its scope, CK theory appears incomplete for engineering design and does not consider important dimensions of the validity of the research program as claimed. Then we analyze the foundations and hypotheses of CK theory from a critical viewpoint. Some suggestions for its improvement are made. Additionally, the ability of CK theory both to effectively assist and direct the creative process and, moreover, to organize the complete design and innovation processes is questioned. Finally, we draw conclusions about the ambitious program and results claimed by the creators of CK theory.

Keywords: CK Theory; design theory; innovation; creative process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-08-15
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00705402v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in 22nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Aug 2010, Montréal, Canada. pp.83-92, ⟨10.1115/DETC2010-28523⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00705402v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00705402

DOI: 10.1115/DETC2010-28523

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().