Can Homo Economicus Follow Kant's Categorical Imperative? A Comment

Damien Bazin and Jerome Ballet

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Economic theory has made several attempts at integrating the Kantian categorical imperative. Mark D. White recently proposed such an analysis. This is a comment on his article. Our commentary on White's article shall be presented through two distinct sections. We shall first discuss the status of obligations and then finally link the debate to the philosophical question of internalism.

Keywords: Internalism; Kant; Categorical imperative; Internalism. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-08-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2005, 34 (4), pp.572-577. ⟨10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.009⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Can homo economicus follow Kant's categorical imperative?: A comment (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00727575

DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().