Analogy-based Expectation Equilibrium
Philippe Jehiel ()
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
In complex situations, agents use simplified representations to learn how their environment may react. I assume that agents bundle nodes at which other agents must move into analogy classes, and agents only try to learn the average behavior in every class. Specifically, I propose a new solution concept for multi-stage games with perfect information: at every node players choose best-responses to their analogy-based expectations, and expectations correctly represent the average behavior in every class. The solution concept is shown to differ from existing concepts, and it is applied to a variety of games, in particular the centipede game, and ultimatum/bargaining games. The approach explains in a new way why players may Pass for a large number of periods in the centipede game, and why the responder need not be stuck to his reservation value in ultimatum games. Some possible avenues for endogenizing the analogy grouping are also suggested.
Keywords: Game theory; Bounded rationality; Expectation; Reasoning by analogy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (346)
Published in Journal of Economic Theory, 2005, 123 (2), pp.81-104. ⟨10.1016/j.jet.2003.12.003⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Analogy-based expectation equilibrium (2005) 
Working Paper: Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium (2005) 
Working Paper: Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00754070
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2003.12.003
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().