Empirical Comparison of Markov and Quantum models of decision-making
Jérôme Busemeyer,
Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky and
Zheng Wang
Additional contact information
Jérôme Busemeyer: Indiana University - Indiana University [Bloomington] - Indiana University System
Zheng Wang: OSU - The Ohio State University [Columbus]
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
There are at least two general theories for building probabilistic-dynamical systems: one is Markov theory and another is quantum theory. These two mathematical frameworks share many fundamental ideas, but they also differ in some key properties. On the one hand, Markov theory obeys the law of total probability, but quantum theory does not; on the other hand, quantum theory obeys the doubly stochastic law, but Markov theory does not. Therefore, the decision about whether to use a Markov or a quantum system depends on which of these laws are empirically obeyed in an application. This article derives two general methods for testing these theories that are parameter free, and presents a new experimental test. The article concludes with a review of experimental findings from cognitive psychology that evaluate these two properties.
Keywords: Markov processes; Quantum probability; Categorization; Decision making; Interference effects; Double stochasticity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)
Published in Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2009, 53 (5), pp.423-433. ⟨10.1016/j.jmp.2009.03.002⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00754332
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.03.002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().