Economics at your fingertips  

Is There One Unifying Concept of Utility?An Experimental Comparison of Utility Under Risk and Utility Over Time

Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt, Olivier l’Haridon and Corina Paraschiv
Additional contact information
Han Bleichrodt: Erasmus School of Economics - Erasmus University Rotterdam
Olivier l’Haridon: CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR1 - Université de Rennes 1 - UNIV-RENNES - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Corina Paraschiv: GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPD5 - Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Olivier l'Haridon

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The nature of utility is controversial. Whereas decision theory commonly assumes that utility is context specific, applied and empirical decision analysis typically assumes one unifying concept of utility applicable to all decision problems. This controversy has hardly been addressed empirically because of the absence of methods to measure utility outside the context of risk. We introduce a method to measure utility over time and compare utility under risk and utility over time. We distinguish between gains and losses and also measure loss aversion. In two experiments we found that utility under risk and utility over time differed and were uncorrelated. Utility under risk was more curved than utility over time. Subjects were loss averse both for risk and for time, but loss aversion was more pronounced for risk. Loss aversion over risk and time were uncorrelated. This suggests that loss aversion, although important in both decision contexts, is volatile and subject to framing.

Keywords: discounting; prospect theory; nature of utility; intertemporal choice; decision under risk; loss aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-09
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed

Published in Management Science, INFORMS, 2013, 59 (9), pp.2153 - 2169. 〈10.1287/mnsc.1120.1690〉

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Is There One Unifying Concept of Utility?An Experimental Comparison of Utility Under Risk and Utility Over Time (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

Page updated 2018-09-25
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00816056