"Upping the ante": how to design efficient auctions with entry?

Laurent Lamy

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Of primary importance in auction design is the set of strategies available to the seller at the auction stage. We first formalize hold-up regarding entry costs that preys on second-price auctions when the seller may engage in a costly shill-bidding activity. We derive the optimal reserve and show how shill bidding can make posted prices outperforming auctions. Second, we advocate for a new regulation where shills would be banned but with the possibility of canceling sales ex post, which offers some valuable flexibility: the English auction with jump bids implements, then, the first best in general environments.

Keywords: Auction; Design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published in RAND Journal of Economics, 2013, 44 (2), pp.194-214. ⟨10.1111/1756-2171.12017⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: “Upping the ante”: how to design efficient auctions with entry? (2013)
Working Paper: "Upping the ante": how to design efficient auctions with entry? (2013)
Working Paper: "Upping the ante": How to design efficient auctions with entry? (2010)
Working Paper: "Upping the ante": How to design efficient auctions with entry? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00840844

DOI: 10.1111/1756-2171.12017

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).