EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Key Issues in Local Job Accessibility Measurement: Different Models Mean Different Results

Mathieu Bunel and Elisabeth Tovar

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This methodological paper shows that using different local job accessibility models (LJAs) leads to significantly different empirical appreciations of job accessibility. Matching several exhaustive micro data sources on the Paris region municipalities, the paper benchmarks a representative set of LJA measurement models used in the recent literature and an original model where job availability is fully estimated according to a set of individual characteristics, job competition is fully modelled on the local labour market and frontier effects are controlled for. We show that the model-induced empirical differences are spatially differentiated across the Paris region municipalities, and that failing to fully estimate job availability may lead to overestimation of the job accessibility levels of underprivileged municipalities.

Keywords: geo-referenced micro-data; Paris region; job accessibility measurement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-geo and nep-ure
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00867924
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Published in Urban Studies, 2014, 51 (6), pp.1322-1338. ⟨10.1177/0042098013495573⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00867924/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Key Issues in Local Job Accessibility Measurement: Different Models Mean Different Results (2014) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00867924

DOI: 10.1177/0042098013495573

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00867924