Low climate stabilisation under diverse growth and convergence scenarios
Anil Markandaya,
Mikel Gonzalez-Eguino,
Patrick Criqui () and
Silvana Mima ()
Additional contact information
Anil Markandaya: BC3 - Basque Centre for Climate Change
Mikel Gonzalez-Eguino: BC3 - Basque Centre for Climate Change
Patrick Criqui: équipe EDDEN - PACTE - Pacte, Laboratoire de sciences sociales - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Silvana Mima: équipe EDDEN - PACTE - Pacte, Laboratoire de sciences sociales - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Few papers have analysed the consequences of low climate stabilisation. Most models and scenarios assume that future trends in global GDP will be similar to the growth experienced in the past century, which would imply multiplying current output nineteen-fold in this century. However, natural resource and environmental constraints suggest that future global economic growth may not be so high. Furthermore, the environmental implications of such growth depend on how it is distributed across countries. This paper studies the implications on GHG abatement policies of different assumptions on global GDP growth and convergence levels. A partial equilibrium model (POLES) of the world's energy system is used to provide detailed projections up to 2050 for the different regions of the world. The results suggest that while low stabilisation is technically feasible and economically viable for the world in all the scenarios considered, it is more likely to occur with more modest global growth. Convergence in living standards on the other hand places greater pressures in terms of the required reduction in emissions. In general we find that there are major differences between regions in terms of the size and the timing of abatement costs and economic impact.
Keywords: Convergence; Economic growth; Climate policy; Partial Equilibrium models; Energy forecasting; Abatement cost; Energy systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00872630v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Published in Energy Policy, 2014, 64, pp.288-301. ⟨10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.046⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00872630v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00872630
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.046
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().