A ranking method based on handicaps
Gabrielle Demange
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Ranking methods are fundamental tools in many areas. Popular methods aggregate the statements of "experts" in different ways. As such, there are various reasonable ranking methods, each one of them more or less adapted to the environment under consideration. This paper introduces a new method, called the handicap-based method, and characterizes it through appealing properties. This method assigns not only scores to the items, but also weights to the experts. Scores and weights form an equilibrium for a relationship based on the notion of handicaps. The method is, in a sense made precise in the paper, the counterpart to the counting method in environments that require intensity invariance. Intensity invariance is a desirable property when the intensity of the experts' statements has to be controlled. Otherwise, both the counting and the handicap-based methods satisfy a property called homogeneity, which is a desirable property when cardinal statements matter, as is the case in many applications.
Keywords: peers' method; handicap; scaling matrix; scores; invariant method; Ranking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01109087v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (43)
Published in Theoretical Economics, 2014, 9 (3), pp.915-942. ⟨10.3982/TE1217⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01109087v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: A Ranking Method Based on Handicaps (2014) 
Working Paper: A ranking method based on handicaps (2014) 
Working Paper: A ranking method based on handicaps (2013) 
Working Paper: A ranking method based on handicaps (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01109087
DOI: 10.3982/TE1217
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().