EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Job evaluation and pay equity: stakes and methods

Anne-Françoise Bender and Frédérique Pigeyre ()
Additional contact information
Anne-Françoise Bender: LISE - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire pour la sociologie économique - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Frédérique Pigeyre: IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Despite significant anti-discrimination laws in most western countries, gender pay gap still remains a substantial concern. To fight the persistant undervaluation of feminised occupations, various actions and research have been conducted on non discriminating ways to evaluate jobs and fix salaries. The notion of Comparable Worth has been promoted for several years by the ILO and a few countries to fight against relatively lower female salaries. It is particularly proned by the European Union. In this article, we review the rationales for Comparable Worth and explain how gender biases are generally involved in traditional job evaluation method. We particularly present the case of the French Equality Ombudsman's guide, which has been published in 2013 with the participation of various experts and unions representatives. It aims at giving guidelines and " good practices " in order to prevent gender discrimination in job evaluation. We then expose some experiments in other countries which give insights on how such a guide could really improve pay equity.

Keywords: Job evaluation; Pay equity; Gender equity; Gender pay gap; Comparable Worth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-06-04
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01340259v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Conference EURAM, Jun 2014, Valencia, Spain

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01340259v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01340259

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01340259