Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas
Franz Dietrich and
Christian List
Additional contact information
Christian List: LSE - London School of Economics and Political Science
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
How can several individuals' probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective probability assignment? Classic results on this problem assume that the set of relevant events – the agenda – is a-algebra and is thus closed under disjunction (union) and conjunction (intersection). We drop this demanding assumption and explore probabilistic opinion pooling on general agendas. One might be interested in the probability of rain and that of an interest-rate increase, but not in the probability of rain or an interest-rate increase. We characterize linear pooling and neutral pooling for general agendas, with classic results as special cases for agendas that are algebras. As an illustrative application, we also consider probabilistic preference aggregation. Finally, we unify our results with existing results on binary judgment aggregation and Arrovian preference aggregation. We show that the same kinds of axioms (independence and consensus preservation) have radically different implications for different aggregation problems: linearity for probability aggregation and dictatorship for binary judgment or preference aggregation.
Keywords: agenda characterizations; vague/fuzzy preferences; Probabilistic opinion pooling; judgment aggregation; subjective probability; probabilistic preferences; a unifed perspective on aggregation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01485792v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Published in Social Choice and Welfare, 2017, 48 (4), pp.747-786. ⟨10.1007/s00355-017-1034-z⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01485792v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas (2017) 
Working Paper: Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas (2017) 
Working Paper: Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas (2017) 
Working Paper: Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas (2017) 
Working Paper: Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part one: General agendas (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01485792
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-017-1034-z
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().