Théorie de la régulation, régulations, "régulationnistes": éléments de méthodes et conditions d’une communauté épistémique

Jean-Pierre Chanteau

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper provides a characterization of the empiric field of the theory of social regulatory systems by scanning its history and the findings from other social sciences. Then it explains the diversity of researchers' practices within this field by taking into account ontological issues ? Thus specifying two opposite approaches competing within the theoretical field of the regulation (positivist-injunctive vs constructivist-procedural). We find out that the second one falls within the scope of critical structurism, providing some methodological guidelines for the necessary researcher's reflexivity and a heuristic framework to articulate an explicit epistemic community of heterodox scientists – within which "regulationists".

Keywords: theory of regulation; critical structurism; constructivism; symbolic interactions; institutionalist analysis; théorie de la régulation; structurisme; critique constructivisme; interactions symboliques; analyse institutionnaliste (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Cahiers d'Economie Politique = Papers in political economy, 2017, 72, pp.69-113. ⟨10.3917/cep.072.0069⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Théorie de la régulation: pourquoi ? comment ? Approche structuriste et déconstruction du symbolique en économie (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01585893

DOI: 10.3917/cep.072.0069

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().