Happiness, income and poverty

Andrew Clark

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: There is considerable evidence from a variety of sources to suggest that well-being is a function of relative income. These findings have been used to explain the Easterlin Paradox, whereby a rise in income for all does not lead to a rise in average happiness in a country (even though the cross section relationship between income and happiness is positive). This relativity of utility has led to calls for policy to focus away from GDP. I here first discuss some of the evidence that well-being is indeed relative in income, but then consider two relatively little-analysed issues to suggest that there may continue to be a role for GDP per capita in happiness-based policy: the inequality of subjective well-being, and the specific case of those in income poverty.

Keywords: Happiness; Income; Inequality; Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Published in International Review of Economics Education, 2017, 64 (2), pp.145-158. ⟨10.1007/s12232-017-0274-7⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Happiness, income and poverty (2017)
Working Paper: Happiness, income and poverty (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01630349

DOI: 10.1007/s12232-017-0274-7

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().