Interviews and the Historiographical Issues of Oral Sources
Dorian Jullien
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This chapter discusses the similarities and differences in the plurality of practices regarding the use of interviews by historians of economics – i.e., either the use of someone else's interviews as sources or the use of interviews conducted by the historian for her or his work. It draws on methodological and historiographical contributions from other disciplines where the use of interviews is more systematic to characterize the practices in our discipline and to sometimes suggest further or new developments. The characterizations of the use of interviews by historians of economics focus on three interrelated factors that impact the relation between the historian (potentially as an interviewer) and her or his sources (i.e., the interviewee): (1) the goals of the research project for which interviews are used, (2) the potentially perceived threats to scientific credit and legitimacy that history of contemporary science can trigger for some scientists and (3) the specificities of oral sources compared to more traditional written sources. Word count (without bibliography and appendix): 8249 1
Date: 2019
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01651062
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in Till Düppe; Roy Weintraub. The Historiography of Contemporary Economics, Routledge, 2019
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01651062/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01651062
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().