Methodological Choices and Research Design

Emmanuel Ravalet and Stéphanie Vincent-Geslin ()
Additional contact information
Emmanuel Ravalet: LASUR - Laboratoire de sociologie urbaine - EPFL - Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Stéphanie Vincent-Geslin: LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We begin by clarifying the definition of high mobility, then we present the quantitative and qualitative instruments before discussing the advantages of a mixed research methodology. This chapter presents the methodology, its benefits and limitations.

Keywords: high mobility; methodological choices; cross-national comparison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Gil Viry; Vincent Kaufmann. High Mobility in Europe. Work and Personal Life, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.16-28, 2015, 978-1-137-44737-1. ⟨10.1057/9781137447388⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01741428

DOI: 10.1057/9781137447388

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().