A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret

Damien Bol (), André Blais and Jean-François Laslier
Additional contact information
Damien Bol: King‘s College London
André Blais: UdeM - Université de Montréal

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The paper builds upon an original pre- and post-election survey that we conducted before and after the 2015 Canadian election. Directly after Election Day, we asked Canadians for which party they voted, and whether they regret their choice. We find that 39% of them are not perfectly happy with their decision, and 4% even say that they made a bad decision. We show that the propensity to regret can be explained by a mixed-utility theory, whereby voters attempt to maximize a mixture of instrumental and expressive utilities. Our study contributes to the literatures on voting behaviour and political economy, which usually considers that voters are either instrumental or expressive, but not both at the same time.

Keywords: Voting behaviour; Expressive voting; Vote choice regret (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in Public Choice, 2018, 176 (3-4), pp.461 - 478. ⟨10.1007/s11127-018-0571-z⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret (2018)
Working Paper: A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01885418

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-018-0571-z

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().