Can social ecological economics of water reinforce the “big tent”?

Arnaud Buchs (), Olivier Petit and Philippe Roman
Additional contact information
Arnaud Buchs: IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble-UGA - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes
Philippe Roman: ICHEC - Brussels Management School [Bruxelles]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper seeks to characterize the importance of the social and political dimensions of the literature dedicated to water in the field of ecological economics. It attempts to assess the relevance of Spash's division of the community into three "camps", namely "new resource economists", "social ecological economists" and "new environmental pragmatists" through the literature focusing on water issues published in leading scientific journals. We begin with an analysis of the main ontological, epistemological and methodological tenets of the three "camps". We then analyze the relevance and limits of such categorization for water research through papers published in Ecological Economics. We then explore the field of ecological economics of water through textual statistics obtained from research abstracts published in five selected journals since the late 1980s. Our results raise questions regarding the relevance of the partition of the ecological economics community thanks to a Venn diagram that presents limited overlaps. We promote an inclusive representation of the "big tent" of ecological economics, thus suggesting new perspectives for the debate on methodological pluralism in Ecological Economics. To conclude, a series of recommendations are suggested to promote water social ecological eco- nomics, and strengthen pluralism within the community.

Keywords: Methodological pluralism; Content analysis; Social ecological economics; “Big tent”; Water (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02404315v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Published in Ecological Economics, 2020, 169 (March), ⟨10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106553⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02404315v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Can social ecological economics of water reinforce the “big tent”? (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02404315

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106553

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().