Postface: What to do with the "capability approach"? For a Rawlsian reading of Sen's contribution

Postface: Que faire de "l'approche par les capacités" ? Pour une lecture "rawlsienne" de l'apport de Sen

Claude Gamel

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Amartya Sen's « capability approach » makes strong consensus among theorists and practitioners of social sciences. Nevertheless it seems that general consistency of this approach is not self-evident and that all public policies it may justify are not well ordered. Therefore we justify the idea that Sen's uncontestable contribution – the substitution of "capabilities" to "resources" - would be more fruitful and more valued, if it were left "embedded" in the general and hierarchized framework of John Rawls' theory of justice. As a consequence, we can wonder whether the basic distinction, that Sen recently suggested, between "transcendental" and "comparative" approaches of social justice is useful, whereas that distinction makes his criticism against "rawlsian" theory even more radical.

Keywords: Resources; capabilities; principles of justice; transcendental approach; comparative approach.; Ressources; capacités; principes de justice; approche transcendantale; approche comparative. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Formation emploi : revue française des sciences sociales , 2007, Numéro spécial : "Pour une approche par les capacités", avril-juin (98)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02512504

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().