 Who benefited from the July 2009 sit-down restaurant value-added tax cuts?Youssef Benzarti and
Dorian Carloni
Post-Print from HAL Abstract: In July 2009, the Value-Added Tax (VAT) rate on sit-down restaurants was cut from 19.6% to 5.5%. At the time, a substantial number of restaurant owners signed the so-called Contrat d'avenir committing to sharing the windfalls from the VAT reduction equally among consumers, workers and themselves. This note shows that the effects of the reform were significantly different from what was suggested by the Contrat d'avenir. Indeed, the VAT reduction mostly benefited restaurant owners. More precisely, we find that prices only decreased by 1.9% thirty months after the VAT cut, the cost of employees and material goods increased by 4.1 and 5 % respectively, and that the profits of sit-down restaurants owners increased by around 24 %. Using these estimates we conclude that: the effect on consumers was limited, employees and sellers of material goods shared 18.6 and 12.1% of the total benefit, and the reform mostly benefited owners of sit-down restaurants, who pocketed around 56% of the tax cut. We also analyze the effect of the January 2012 VAT increase from 5.5% to 7% and the January 2014 VAT increase from 7% to 10% and find that prices increased 4 to 5 times more than they decreased following the VAT cut. This suggests that temporary VAT cuts mostly benefit firms rather than consumers and can result in higher equilibrium prices once repealed. Date: 2018-05 Published in 2018 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02520828 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.