Merchants of doubt: Corporate political action when NGO credibility is uncertain
Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline () and
Thomas Lyon ()
Additional contact information
Thomas Lyon: University of Michigan [Ann Arbor] - University of Michigan System
Post-Print from HAL
The literature on special interest groups emphasizes two main influence channels: campaign contributions and informational lobbying. We introduce a third channel: providing information about the credibility of political rivals. In particular, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) often aim to communicate scientific knowledge to policymakers, but industry‐backed groups often attempt to undermine their credibility. We extend a standard signaling model of interest‐group lobbying to include fixed costs of policymaker action and show that these costs make possible two mechanisms for creating doubt about the value of policy action. The first uses Bayesian persuasion to suggest the NGO may be a noncredible radical. The second involves creating an opposition think tank (TT) that acts as a possible radical, not a credible moderate. We show that the TT cannot always implement the Bayesian persuasion benchmark, and we characterize how optimal TT design varies with exogenous parameters.
Keywords: Informational lobbying; persuasion; nonmarket strategy; special interest politics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-mic and nep-pol
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02552465
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Wiley, 2020, 29 (2), pp.439-461. ⟨10.1111/jems.12338⟩
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Merchants of doubt: Corporate political action when NGO credibility is uncertain (2020)
Working Paper: Merchants of doubt: Corporate political action when NGO credibility is uncertain (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02552465
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().