EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Reconciling yield gains in agronomic trials with returns under African smallholder conditions

Rachid Laajaj, Karen Macours, Cargele Masso, Moses Thuita and Bernard Vanlauwe
Additional contact information
Cargele Masso: IITA-DRC - International Institute of Tropical Agriculture - IITA - International Institute of Tropical Agriculture [Nigeria] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR]
Moses Thuita: IITA-DRC - International Institute of Tropical Agriculture - IITA - International Institute of Tropical Agriculture [Nigeria] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR]
Bernard Vanlauwe: IITA-DRC - International Institute of Tropical Agriculture - IITA - International Institute of Tropical Agriculture [Nigeria] - CGIAR - Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Increased adoption of improved agricultural technologies is considered an essential step to address global poverty and hunger, and agronomic trials suggest intensification in developing countries could result in large yield gains. Yet the promise of new technologies does not always carry over from trials to real-life conditions, and diffusion of many technologies remains limited. We show how parcel and farmer selection, together with behavioural responses in agronomic trials, can explain why yield gain estimates from trials may differ from the yield gains of smallholders using the same inputs under real-life conditions. We provide quantitative evidence by exploiting variation in farmer selection and detailed data collection from research trials in Western Kenya on which large yield increments were observed from improved input packages for maize and soybean. After adjusting for selection, behavioural responses, and other corrections, estimates of yield gains fall to being not significantly different from zero for the input package tested on one of the crops (soybean), but remain high for the other (maize). These results suggest that testing new agricultural technologies in real-world conditions and without researcher interference early in the agricultural research and development process might help with identifying which innovations are more likely to be taken up at scale.

Date: 2020-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Published in Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1), ⟨10.1038/s41598-020-71155-y⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Reconciling yield gains in agronomic trials with returns under African smallholder conditions (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02973685

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71155-y

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02973685