Nomadism: A forgotten paradigm

Delphine Mercier () and Pierre Tripier ()
Additional contact information
Delphine Mercier: LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, SoMuM - Sociétés en Mutation en Méditerranée - AMU - Aix Marseille Université
Pierre Tripier: PRINTEMPS - Professions, institutions, temporalités - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In this chapter, we wish to explore the timless conflict between nomadic and sedentary people using sociological tools. This starts with the observation that Western political philosophy, and with it, the understanding of democracy, social contract, and society, are essentially sedentary visions. However, since at least the fall of Roman Empire, sedentary people have always lived alongside nomadic people, often in a conflictual relationship. Globalization gives nomads an opportunity to play a major historical role once again, but this reality is obsucred as theories rooted in the dominant paradigms cannot conceive of this reality, as demonstrated by Monsutti's work with Homo-Itinerans, Peraldi's description of the Suitcase Trader, and Tarrius work on Transmigrants... Although research on migration abounds, for some, it does so without addressing the issues that are crucial to understanding nomadism in its modern form, those that describe not simply the displacement but the reasons behind it: social conditions, trade, war, work, mobility, mobilization... Our hypothesis is that this is also true for the theme of the nomad, which is rejected by sedendary populations. Like colonized peoples, Third World inhabitants or minorities, immigrants, and women, the nomad is considered not only illegitimate, but, as with colonized peoples, he is thought of at best as a quirk, and at worst as a manifestation of barbarity. No person is more fully an actor in the globalized world than the nomad. We will first return to the origins of this "nomadic" paradigm by discussing the key terms that characterize it, such as "family," "clan," and "tribe," but above all by demonstrating the incomprehension and invisibility of this paradigm. We will then consider the nomads by analyzing the difficulties they encounter with what Weber (1922) calls the "rational-legal order." Finally, we will attempt to reflect on this modern nomadism and thus on a new epistemology of research that is adapted to the subject studied.

Keywords: paradigm; nomad; sedentary; social contract; clan; tribe; protection; fluidity; migration; transmigration; globalization. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Aline Averbough; Nejma Goutas; Sophie Mery. Nomad Lives. From Prehistoric times to the present day., Publications Scientifiques du Museum, 2021, 978-2-85653-966-8

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02990121

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().