Edmond Malinvaud's Criticisms of the New Classical Economics: Restoring the Nature and the Rationale of the Old Keynesians' Opposition

Matthieu Renault

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Unlike standard accounts, recent research in the history of macroeconomics has given increasing attention to the Old Keynesians' criticisms of the New Classical Economics. In this paper, I address the case of Edmond Malinvaud, who began opposing the latter from the early 1980s and did so throughout the following thirty years. This study shows that his opposition was radical, i.e., multidimensional and systematic, and owes to the methodology and the practice of macroeconometric modeling. In turn, this twofold result sheds light on the nature and the rationale of the Old Keynesians' opposition to the New Classical Economics from the 1970s onwards, which can be interpreted along the same lines.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Journal of the History of Economic Thought, In press, ⟨10.31219/osf.io/2fphv⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: EDMOND MALINVAUD’S CRITICISMS OF THE NEW CLASSICAL ECONOMICS: RESTORING THE NATURE AND THE RATIONALE OF THE OLD KEYNESIANS’ OPPOSITION (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03051728

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2fphv

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().