The Keynes Plan and Bretton Woods debates: the early radical criticisms by Balogh, Schumacher and Kalecki

Adrien Faudot

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The prestige of John Maynard Keynes, as well as the smart design of his plan, made the proposal for an International Clearing Union particularly worthy of interest when it was released. Economists with orthodox views on international adjustment criticised the plan, but less well known criticisms also came from within Keynesian circles. Several economists in J. M. Keynes' professional milieu provided comments and asked for amendments to the draft plan in order to improve his scheme for the clearing union. This paper analyses the published responses of Ernst F. Schumacher, Thomas Balogh and Michal Kalecki to the Keynes Plan. These authors provide early, radical criticisms of his plan, targeting the sustainability and efficiency of the proposed international monetary reform.

Keywords: International Clearing Union; Balogh; Kalecki; Schumacher (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-07-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2021, 45 (4), pp.751-770. ⟨10.1093/cje/beab018⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: The Keynes Plan and Bretton Woods debates: the early radical criticisms by Balogh, Schumacher and Kalecki (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03286720

DOI: 10.1093/cje/beab018

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().