Les effets économiques de l’originalisme constitutionnel aux États-Unis

Thierry Kirat and Frédéric Marty

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The originalism that has been developing in American case law since the 1970s aims to base court rulings on the search for the legislator's intention from the original meaning of the Constitution. While originalism aims to reduce judicial discretion and thus ensure consistency and predictability of decisions, it is often seen as carrying a socially conservative and economically pro-market bias. The article shows how different variants of originalism have effectively led to a constitutional basis for reduced federal economic interventionism and pro-market policies.

Keywords: Originalisme; Interprétation; Antitrust (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue Interdisciplinaire d'Etudes Juridiques, 2022, 89 (2), pp.3-38. ⟨10.3917/riej.089.0003⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03917349

DOI: 10.3917/riej.089.0003

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().