Les sociétés coopératives de production à la marge de la gouvernance territoriale ? Une analyse à partir de Scop-Scic en régions Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes et Sud-PACA

Maud Hirczak (), Julien Maisonnasse (), Francesca Petrella () and Nadine Richez-Battesti ()
Additional contact information
Maud Hirczak: AMU - Aix Marseille Université, LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Julien Maisonnasse: LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Francesca Petrella: LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Nadine Richez-Battesti: LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Cooperatives, and more particularly cooperative societies of production (Scop) and collective interest cooperative societies (Scic), are enjoying a revival of activity in the economic, political and scientific spheres. Research works have multiplied, in particular on governance and management, but the link to the territory of production cooperatives remains under documented. The originality of this article is to question the relations between cooperatives and territorial governance by asking the following question: do production cooperatives (Scop and Scic) participate in territorial governance? Does the fact that production companies have an internal participative dynamic and a particular governance make them singular actors of territorial governance? Based on a qualitative methodology comparing 2 Scop and 3 Scic, we highlight that cooperative companies, despite their singularities, remain at the margin of territorial governance, for three reasons: the great heterogeneity of their relationships with the territory, the predominance of sector and network logics, and finally their still embryonic political work for their recognition.

Keywords: Société coopérative; ESS; Gouvernance territoriale; Territoire; Société coopérative d'intérêt collectif; SCOP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-06-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03963587
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Géographie, Économie, Société, 2023, 24 (2-3), pp.185-206. ⟨10.3166/ges.2023.0009⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03963587

DOI: 10.3166/ges.2023.0009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().