Non aes sed fides. Réflexions sur le pouvoir de la monnaie

André Orléan ()
Additional contact information
André Orléan: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The institutionalist approach is based on the thesis that money is the result of a collective process of election through which a community of commodity producers constructs its cohesion by creating a shared representation of value, namely the unit of account. This conception of money as a community fact is opposed to both the instrumentalist conception, defended by neoclassical theory, according to which money is a simple technical means of facilitating exchange, and the chartalist approach, according to which money is a creature of the state. In the institutionalist perspective, money derives its authority from the confidence of the group that elected it. Because of the collective investment of which it is the object, monetary belief is endowed with an autonomous power that the State does not control and that imposes itself on it. A part of monetary confidence – which we call "ethical confidence" – has at stake the values that the monetary institution defends. This is what the example of bitcoin shows. Indeed, the very idea of a digital currency free of any central institution was developed within the "crypto-anarchist" movement, with the explicit aim of proposing an institutional architecture of exchange that is fully in line with the values and ideological requirements of this movement.

Keywords: Bitcoin; Institutionalism; Sovereignty; Trust; Unity of accoun; Confiance; Institutionalisme; Souveraineté; Unité de compte (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue Française d'Histoire Economique, 2022, 2022/2 (18), pp.8-21. ⟨10.3917/rfhe.018.0008⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04156038

DOI: 10.3917/rfhe.018.0008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().