Cover-ups

Francis Bloch () and Rachel Kranton ()
Additional contact information
Francis Bloch: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Rachel Kranton: Duke University [Durham]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Lengthy cover-ups are a repeated feature of the organizational landscape. This paper studies executives' optimal cover-up strategies given the penalties and the evolving beliefs of strategic outside parties who investigate malfeasance. The analysis shows that organizational self-policing and external investigation are strategic substitutes in any given period. Over time, successful cover-ups increase the incentive to cover up, and changes in the current environment, such as an increased awareness of the harmful effects of the employee's actions, can result in a reduction in cover-ups in the short term but an increase in the long term. We analyze how fines for executives and rewards for investigators affect the welfare of different stakeholders. We extend the model to study two alternative prosecutorial regimes: a prosecutor who can commit to an investigation policy and a long-lived prosecutor who internalizes the impact of their early decisions on a subsequent prosecutor's incentives.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Law and Economics, 2022

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04208553

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().