Driver survey vs GPS Tour data: Strength and weaknesses of the two sources in order to model the drivers’ journeys

Florence Toilier () and Mathieu Gardrat ()
Additional contact information
Florence Toilier: LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Mathieu Gardrat: LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Large data collection campaigns are difficult to implement in a context of public finance scarcity. This is even more true for goods movements observation, as public authorities' interest in this topic is recent and does not benefit from established survey protocols and modeling tools like those for passenger mobility. The use of GPS devices to capture goods' mobility then appears to be an economic substitute for traditional surveys. By comparing the 2 collection modes on the same tours, this paper provides an overview of the reliability of each mode and proposes processing protocols to make the most of GPS data.

Keywords: Declarative driver survey; GPS records; Urban goods movements’ survey; Travelled distances; Stops location; Data collection reliability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Transportation Research Procedia, 2024, 76 (Part of special issue : 12th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods), pp.169-182. ⟨10.1016/j.trpro.2023.12.047⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04455314

DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.12.047

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().