 The challenge of climate-related double materiality on the financial marketLyubov Klapkiv and
Faruk Ülgen
Post-Print from HAL Abstract: An essential element of financial market sustainability is business activity's environmental and social costs – which are not considered in traditional business analysis. Such an approach focuses on assessing the impact of financial institutions' (banks, insurance companies, etc.) activities on the environment and society. Yet, it seems necessary to also consider the impact of environmental and social issues on the activities of financial institutions. Measures against such risks (precautions against the adverse effects of droughts or floods, for instance) can also be seen more broadly as contributing to sustainability goals. These two perspectives that point to the interlinkages/interdependences between activities and environment - the impact of financial institutions' activities on the environment and the impact of environmental degradation on financial institutions' activities - are known as "dual materiality/relevance". Reducing the negative impact of economic activity on the environment in the long term should reduce the adverse effects of the environment on economic activity. In practice, we have two perspectives: the impact of economic activity on the environment (climate change as environmental and social materiality), and the impact of the environment on economic activity (climate change as financial materiality). Overall, understanding the concept of double materiality is vital for financial companies to effectively manage their risks and opportunities related to ESG factors and drive positive outcomes for their stakeholders and the broader society. Financial institutions have started adopting a double-materiality approach to risk management to address these risks. This approach involves assessing the company's financial risks and the financial risks associated with the risks they act against. This can include assessing the potential economic impact of climate change on their operations and investments and the communities and businesses they insure. By adopting a double materiality approach, financial institutions can better understand and manage the risks associated with environmental and social factors. This can help them ensure their financial sustainability while contributing to the sustainability of the broader society and environment they operate in. In line with this, the article seeks to study the institutional framework (directives, regulations, initiatives, corporate reports, and statements) that could support the development of the double materiality approaches for the financial sector. Keywords: Climate finance; Double materiality; Financial regulation; Institutions; Transition and risks (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in ICAPE 2024 "Modern Economic Pluralism: Exploring the synergies and distinctive contributions of contemporary heterodox approaches", International Confederation of Associations for Pluralism in Economics, Jan 2024, San Antonio, United States There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04477509 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.