Why Do Chinese and Indian Positions on Climate Differ? Labor Surplus Absorption as a Key Factor

Pierre Berthaud (), Yann Fontana and Laëtitia Guilhot ()
Additional contact information
Pierre Berthaud: CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes
Yann Fontana: CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes
Laëtitia Guilhot: CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: During international negotiations for the Rio Earth Summit of 1992, coalitions made up of countries from the Global South took shape, only to break up gradually over time. The climate positions of two leading emerging powers, the People's Republic of China and India, have increasingly drifted apart from each other since 2010. This paper seeks to account for this drift by relying on structural factors. The analytical framework proposed here relies on three structural determinants of development: factor endowments, sector specialization, and labor surplus absorption potential. These determinants are complemented by a carbon variable to account for sustainability. This framework reveals a triangle of incompatibility between development, labor surplus absorption, and sustainability that highlights how the People's Republic of China now has sufficient leeway to engage in more ambitious sustainable policies, while India still faces the mutual incompatibility of either pushing forward with economic development or committing to a sustainable agenda.

Keywords: climate negotiations; India; labor surplus absorption; People’s Republic of China; sustainable development; trilemma (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-08-26
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Asian Development Review, 2024, 41 (2), pp.171-192. ⟨10.1142/S0116110524500112⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04692521

DOI: 10.1142/S0116110524500112

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().