Does subsidy increase the use of carpooling via platforms? The case of short-distance carpooling in France

Yao Wang and Guillaume Monchambert ()
Additional contact information
Yao Wang: Shandong Technology and Business University, University of International Business and Economics [Beijing, China], LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Guillaume Monchambert: Université de Lyon, UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2, LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Many initiatives have been introduced worldwide by governments and industry to promote the use of carpooling. In France, some local authorities have introduced carpooling subsidy policies since 2019 to encourage carpooling trips. We estimate the effect of local carpooling subsidies on the usage of platform-organized short-distance carpooling, using a difference-in-differences design that exploits variation across French "Communautés de Communes" (i.e. local authorities) in both the amount of subsidy and the timing of subsidy policy start. We find that, on average, the introduction of the subsidy increases the number of monthly short-distance carpool trips organized by platforms by approximately 5.2 trips per 1,000 inhabitants in the area covered by the local authority, and this effect increases over time. The study of the effect of the subsidy amount shows that a €1 increase in the carpooling subsidy improves the number of monthly carpool trips organized by platforms by 3.9 trips per 1,000 inhabitants. These average effects mask considerable heterogeneity, with subsidy increasing carpooling use more in larger and more densely populated local authority areas, and the effect being negligible in the smallest and least densely populated local authority areas. We also use survey results to investigate opportunity, windfall and environmental effects of the policy. It indicates our estimates of subsidy effects should be reduced by one-third or one-half to obtain the net new carpoolers effect, as between half and a third of the new carpoolers joining the platforms after the introduction of the subsidy are due to the opportunity effect. We find that carpooling subsidy amount needed to save one ton of CO2 is roughly between €1000 and €1300.

Keywords: Carpool; Subsidy; Short-distance; Two-way fixed effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2026, 203, pp.104767. ⟨10.1016/j.tra.2025.104767⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-05426602

DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104767

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().