Distributional tax analysis in theory and practice: Harberger meets Diamond-Mirrlees

Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman ()
Additional contact information
Emmanuel Saez: UC - University of California
Gabriel Zucman: UC - University of California, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper proposes a new framework to study the distribution of current taxes and the effects of tax reforms. For current taxes, labor taxes are assigned to the corresponding workers, capital taxes to the corresponding asset owners, and consumption taxes to the corresponding consumers. Current taxes capture the wedges between pre-tax prices (relevant for production) and after-tax prices (relevant for the work, saving, and consumption decisions of households) as well as the direct equity effects of taxes while being silent about efficiency. Our method does not require structural assumptions, is internally consistent, and maximizes the comparability of tax progressivity and inequality over time and across countries. Applying this methodology to the United States, we find that the effective tax rate of the top 1% has declined from about 50% in the early 1950s to 32% in 2021. It is through the corporate tax that a high degree of tax progressivity was achieved in the middle of the 20th century. To analyze the distributional effects of tax reforms, mechanical changes in tax liability by income groups and aggregate revenue effects due to household (but not firms') behavioral responses are sufficient statistics in the neoclassical optimal tax model of Diamond and Mirrlees (1971). The effects of taxes on pre-tax prices at the heart of classical tax incidence analysis are normatively irrelevant.

Date: 2026-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Public Economics, 2026, 259, ⟨10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105675⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-05660633

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105675

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().