Inequality decomposition analysis, the Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient

Marc Fleurbaey (), Peter Lambert, Domenico Moramarco and Vito Peragine
Additional contact information
Marc Fleurbaey: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris
Peter Lambert: University of Oregon [Eugene]
Domenico Moramarco: University of Bari

PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) from HAL

Abstract: We compare two alternative procedures for decomposing the Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient into within-groups and between-groups contributions: the standard additive decomposition (Bhattacharya and Mahalanobis in J Am Stat Assoc 62(317):143–161, 1967) and another inspired by the path-independent decomposition (Foster and Shneyerov in J Econ Theory 91(2):199–222, 2000). We show that the former approach offers a clean measure of the between-group inequality, which is insensitive to changes in the distribution that do not alter the relative difference between the groups' averages. On the other hand, the latter approach offers an unbiased measure of the within-group inequality, which is independent of the between-group component. Hence, we propose and interpret a new decomposition of the Gini index that is based on the path-independent approach. Finally, we explore the implications of Lorenz between-group dominance combined with Lorenz within-group dominance. We show the difficulty of defining sufficient conditions for two Lorenz curves not to intersect and suggest an alternative partial order based on concentration curves which does not account for the overlap between groups.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Social Choice and Welfare, In press, ⟨10.1007/s00355-025-01612-y⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-05158595

DOI: 10.1007/s00355-025-01612-y

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Caroline Bauer ().