Place-Based Policies: A Path to Opportunity or a Mark of Stigma for Targeted Neighborhoods?

Manon Garrouste () and Miren Lafourcade ()
Additional contact information
Manon Garrouste: Université Paris-Saclay, RITM - Réseaux Innovation Territoires et Mondialisation - Université Paris-Saclay
Miren Lafourcade: Université Paris-Saclay, RITM - Réseaux Innovation Territoires et Mondialisation - Université Paris-Saclay, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris, CEPR - Center for Economic Policy Research

PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) from HAL

Abstract: In France, place-based policies channel public subsidies to low-income urban zones labeled "priority" neighborhoods. Yet, such policies may backfire by stigmatizing the targeted areas. This paper exploits a quasi-experimental discontinuity created by a reform that redrew the subsidy map using a local poverty cutoff to evaluate impacts on school outcomes, population sorting, and urban segregation across labeled and unlabeled neighborhoods. Using a difference-in-differences design, we show that public middle schools in newly designated neighborhoods experienced a persistent decline in enrollment relative to schools in unlabeled areas just above the cutoff. This territorial stigma, driven by school avoidance across all socioeconomic groups, redirected pupils to public schools in unlabeled areas and, among wealthier families, to private schools. Policy designation also depressed housing prices and triggered reverse gentrification, while educational support proved insufficient to offset rising urban segregation. Crucially, the stigma persisted even after neighborhoods lost their subsidized status, leading to sustained declines in academic achievement due to both reputational damage and subsidy withdrawal.

Date: 2026-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of the European Economic Association, 2026, ⟨10.1093/jeea/jvag062⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-05840834

DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvag062

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Caroline Bauer ().