Measuring Well-Being and Lives Worth Living
Marc Fleurbaey () and
Gregory Ponthiere ()
Additional contact information
Marc Fleurbaey: Princeton University
PSE Working Papers from HAL
We study the measurement of well-being when individuals have hetero- geneous preferences, including di_erent conceptions of a life worth living. When individuals di_er in the conception of a life worth living, the equivalent income can regard an individual whose life is not worth living as being better o_ than an individual whose life is worth living. In order to avoid that paradoxical result, we reexamine the ethical foundations of well-being measures in such a way as to take into account heterogeneity in the conception of a life worth living. We derive, from simple axioms, an alternative measure of well-being, which is an equivalent income net of the income threshold making lifetime neutral. That new well-being index always ranks an individual whose life is not worth living as worse-o_ than an individual with a life worth living.
Keywords: Well-being; measurement; equivalent income; lifetime; value of life (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem and nep-hap
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02393398
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Measuring Well-Being and Lives Worth Living (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-02393398
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in PSE Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().