From Communism to Capitalism: Private Versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia

Filip Novokmet, Thomas Piketty, Li Yang and Gabriel Zucman
Additional contact information
Filip Novokmet: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, WIL - World Inequality Lab
Li Yang: Beijing University of Agriculture

World Inequality Lab Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Since 1980, many economies around the world have experienced two trends: rising aggregate private wealth-income ratio and increasing income inequality (Piketty and Zucman 2014; Piketty 2014). These trends have been particularly spectacular in China and Russia since their transitions from communism to more capitalist orientated economic systems (Piketty, Yang, and Zucman 2017; Novokmet, Piketty, and Zucman 2017). The transition to a mixed economy has taken different economic and political forms in China and Russia—with different privatization strategies for public assets, in particular. These different strategies have had a large impact on inequality and wealth ownership. In China, the transition has involved gradual but nevertheless wideranging reforms. The reforms were implemented progressively, from special economic zones in coastal cities towards inland provincial regions, and in sectoral waves. By contrast, Russia opted for a "bigbang" transition after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1990-1991, with a rapid transfer of public assets to the private sector and the hasty introduction of free market economic principles. In this paper, we compare our recent findings on private and public wealth accumulation in China and Russia, and discuss the impact of the different privatization strategies followed in the two countries on income inequality.

Keywords: Communism; Capitalism; Private wealh; Public Property; Inequality; China; Russia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02797937v1
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02797937v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: From Communism to Capitalism: Private versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia (2018)
Working Paper: From Communism to Capitalism: Private versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia (2018)
Working Paper: From Communism to Capitalism: Private versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia (2018)
Working Paper: From Communism to Capitalism: Private Versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia (2018)
Working Paper: From Communism to Capitalism: Private Versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wilwps:halshs-02797937

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in World Inequality Lab Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Caroline Bauer ().