Recurrent Attempts to Renovate Management ControlRevisited through a Simons' Perspective

Nicolas Berland, Jean-Pierre Ponssard and Olivier Saulpic
Additional contact information
Olivier Saulpic: ESCP-EAP

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Three dimensions characterize a management control system: the nature of the involvement of operational managers, the degree of customization of the underlying tools and the relationship with the compensation policy. This characterization further formalizes the distinction between diagnostic and interactive control systems introduced by Simons (1995). It provides an interesting framework to discuss the recurrent attempts to renovate management control that followed the severe criticism of Johnson and Kaplan (1987). In this framework, information systems based on a strategic vision of the activity are representative of interactive control while value based management systems such as EVA are representative of diagnostic control. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed using the proposed taxonomy as a theoretical grid.

Date: 2006
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00243033
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00243033/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Recurrent Attempts to Renovate Management Control Revisited through a Simons' Perspective (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00243033

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().