A game theoretic analysis of the Waterloo campaign and some comments on the analytic narrative project
Philippe Mongin
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
The paper has a twofold aim. On the one hand, it provides what appears to be the first game-theoretic modeling of Napoleon's last campaign, which ended dramatically on 18 June 1815 at Waterloo. It is specifically concerned with the decision Napoleon made on 17 June 1815 to detach part of his army against the Prussians he had defeated, though not destroyed, on 16 June at Ligny. Military historians agree that this decision was crucial but disagree about whether it was rational. Hypothesizing a zero-sum game between Napoleon and Blücher, and computing its solution, we show that it could have been a cautious strategy on the former's part to divide his army, a conclusion which runs counter to the charges of misjudgement commonly heard since Clausewitz. On the other hand, the paper addresses methodological issues. We defend its case study against the objections of irrelevance that have been raised elsewhere against "analytic narratives", and conclude that military campaigns provide an opportunity for successful application of the formal theories of rational choice. Generalizing the argument, we finally investigate the conflict between narrative accounts – the historians' standard mode of expression – and mathematical modeling.
Keywords: Napoléon; Blücher; Grouchy; Waterloo; military history; rational choice theories; game theory; zero-sum two-person games; analytical narrative (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in 2009
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: A game-theoretic analysis of the Waterloo campaign and some comments on the analytic narrative project (2018) 
Working Paper: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Waterloo Campaign and Some Comments on the Analytic Narrative Project (2017) 
Working Paper: A game theoretic analysis of the Waterloo campaign and some comments on the analytic narrative project (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00489974
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().