On the edges of the market: the Court of justice of the European Union and information asymmetry in the regulated professions

Philippe Corruble ()
Additional contact information
Philippe Corruble: HEC Paris - Recherche - Hors Laboratoire - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Some characteristics of the regulated professions cast doubt on whether it is appropriate to apply competition rules to them. Unlike traditional activities, the professions contain a substantial personal aspect relating to the practitioner, who draws on years of training and experience in his field to provide his services. This characteristic, particularly the intellectual aspect, places these activities on the edges of the market, not far from the practice of an art. Competition between professionals focuses on quality, the personally-tailored relationship with clients and speed of execution. In contrast to traditional economic activities, relations between the professional and his client are marked by high information asymmetry. In this context, professional rules (for instance, advertising bans or tariff regulation) that go against EU competition rules can nonetheless help to prevent adverse selection and moral hazard phenomena, and work in favour of the public interest. At a time when economic justification of European law decisions has become very important, can the economic concept of information asymmetry be an argument, a means of legal challenge, actionable before the courts? Can it lead to moderation of the application of competition rules in the regulated professions? To answer these questions, we look specifically at case law issued by the Court of Justice. The first section deals with the gradual emergence of the concept of information asymmetry in the opinions issued by the Court's Advocates General on the question of regulation of professions. The second section discusses the only two decisions that have referred to the concept, and the third and final section concludes on the specific irreducibility of the regulated professions, which in our opinion justifies consideration of the information asymmetry phenomenon by the Court.

Keywords: edges; market; Court; justice; European Union; information; asymmetry; regulated; professions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-09-21
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2011

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00625510

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().