Évaluation de la qualité de la formation professionnelle dans les politiques publiques

Fabienne Berton and Jean-François Germe
Additional contact information
Fabienne Berton: CRF - Centre de recherche sur la formation - Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam] - ENSTA Bretagne - École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées Bretagne
Jean-François Germe: Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam]

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The aim of this research is to propose a synthesis about the French practices concerning the evaluation of quality aspects in vocational training, especially where public policies are concerned. We have selected a relatively small number of evaluation studies (40 reports), which are directly concerned with the CEDEFOP's priority : the training programmes for people that are unemployed or threatened by unemployment. They are principally recent reports, published in the nineties. These reports are mainly issued from public governments or from study and research centers. They concern training programmes which are fully or partially financed by public funds. These training programmes mainly concern two categories: young people and unemployed, but employees can also be involved in the case of retraining courses. These different evaluations do not use the same methods. On the one hand each evaluation appears to be specific while it is related to the specific goal of the particular program, on the other hand the evaluation methods evolve during the time because the relationship between training ant employment are better known. Hence we propose to group the evaluation methods in two large categories: the substantial evaluations and the procedural ones. This typology allows us to emphasize both the each method specificities and the general evolutions of the methods. The first category is thus named because it is related to the results of training actions in regard to their goals. In the second case, the evaluation is concerned with the internal running of the action and particularly in the whole procedures, modes, agreements, conflicts, negotiations, arrangements, translations... that practically appears at the different levels of the exercise.

Keywords: Quality; Substantive evaluation; Public policy; Vocational training; Procedural evaluation; Unemployment; Formation professionnelle : politique publique; Chômage; Qualité; Évaluation en fonction des résultats (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00665414v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in [Rapport de recherche] Cnam (Département travail et entreprise, Centre de recherche sur la formation). 1997

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00665414v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00665414

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().