When Experience Hurts - Experiential learning, perceived task homogeneity and the confidence trap

Oliver Gottschalg () and Maurizio Zollo
Additional contact information
Oliver Gottschalg: INSEAD - Institut Européen d'administration des Affaires
Maurizio Zollo: INSEAD - Institut Européen d'administration des Affaires

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Experience is a principal source of knowledge and an important antecedent to organizational capabilities. At the same time however, the accumulation of experience increases an organization's confidence in its own abilities and confidence and competence may develop asymmetrically over time. We argue that when this occurs, the magnitude of the stock of accumulated experience is likely to correlate negatively with performance as the organization finds itself in a competence trap. We develop a contingency model in which perceived task characteristics (and task homogeneity in particular), act as important determinants of how confidence evolves relative to competence. They are thus moderators of the experience-performance relationship. We empirically test the corresponding theoretical argument in the context of a sample of 1,134 leveraged buyouts and find strong evidence that perceived task homogeneity determines whether experience benefits or hurts the performance of these types of acquisitions.

Keywords: Experience; Experiential learning; perceived task homogeneity; confidence trap (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-12-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2012

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00759586

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().