Ambiguity, Optimism, and Pessimism in Adverse Selection Models
Raphaël Giraud () and
Additional contact information
Lionel Thomas: CRESE - Centre de REcherches sur les Stratégies Economiques - UFC - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté
Working Papers from HAL
We investigate the effect of ambiguity and ambiguity attitude on the shape and properties of the optimal contract in an adverse selection model with a continuum of types, using the parametric model of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion called the NEO-additive model (Chateauneuf, Eichberger, and Grant, 2007). We show that it necessarily features efficiency and a jump at the top and pooling at the bottom of the distribution. Conditional on the degree of ambiguity, the pooling section may or may not be supplemented by a separating section. As a result, ambiguity adversely affects the principal’s ability to solve the adverse selection problem and therefore the least efficient types benefit from ambiguity with respect to risk. Conversely, ambiguity is detrimental to the most efficient types. This is confirmed in the comparative statics section.
Keywords: ambiguity; Adverse selection; ambiguity aversion; NEO-additive model; non-expected utility models; behavioral economics. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic and nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01199139
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01199139
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Series data maintained by CCSD ().