Cities of Commerce: how can we test the hypothesis?

Guillaume Daudin

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This paper discusses Gelderblom's hypothesis that urban competition (including a large number of competing cities, footloose foreign traders and municipal autonomy) was central to the rise of inclusive trade institutions in Europe. The first part discusses the precise behaviour of traders, town authorities and sovereigns underlying Gelderblom's explanatory framework. The second part presents some challenges to the generalisation of the book's thesis to the history of Europe, including Italy and Britain. The last part advances a short econometric exercise to check this generalisation. Urban competition combined with starting institutional quality does not emerge as a positive factor for the growth of European cities in general: this is interpreted as a call for more research rather a decisive counter-argument.

Keywords: Europe; modern history; urbanisation; institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-03-24
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-hpe
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01494926v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01494926v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Cities of Commerce: how can we test the hypothesis? (2014)
Working Paper: Cities of Commerce: How can we test the hypothesis? (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01494926

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().