EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Standardisation and guarantee systems: what can participatory certification offer?

Sylvaine Lemeilleur () and Gilles Allaire ()
Additional contact information
Gilles Allaire: US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The legitimacy of certification for agricultural products depends on the belief that product labelling can provide information and guarantee the quality that consumers want. The neoclassic paradigm actually suggests that the problem of quality is to do with simple asymmetric information between economic agents. In our paper, however, we consider that the notion of quality is by no means objective: practices required (to obtain the given quality) and the credibility and legitimacy of quality control used in the different guarantee systems (to ensure standard compliance), constitute an institutionalised compromising device. This situation results from the balance of power and beliefs that exists between the organisations concerned. In this paper, we compare two different organisational mechanisms when examining the agricultural product standards designed to improve sustainable development: (i) the third party certification (TPC) is a mechanism that most public bodies recognise as being legitimate for the certification of sustainability standards; and (ii) the alternative mechanism of participatory guarantee systems (PGS), which is struggling to gain recognition from public authorities. Finally, we argue that the effectiveness of proximity and social control for guaranteeing sustainability standards in PGS seems just as credible and legitimate as the effectiveness of the independence and neutrality claimed by the TPC in the framework of international standards. In fact, TPC and PGS are alternative and complementary systems, rather than competitive systems, for implementing different sustainability standards.

Keywords: voluntary sustainability standards; third party certification; participatory guarantee systems; quality; organic farming; institutional approach; standardization; standard; sustainable development; approche volontaire; standardisation; norme; développement durable; agriculture biologique; certification; qualité; économie institutionnelle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
Date: 2017-09-26
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01594049
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01594049/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Standardisation and guarantee systems: what can participatory certification offer? (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Standardisation and guarantee systems: what can participatory certification offer? (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01594049

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2019-12-31
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01594049