On the (Ab)Use of Omega?

Massimiliano Caporin, Michele Costola, Gregory Mathieu Jannin and Bertrand Maillet ()
Additional contact information
Michele Costola: Goethe University Frankfurt
Gregory Mathieu Jannin: UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Bertrand Maillet: EM - EMLyon Business School, CEMOI - Centre d'Économie et de Management de l'Océan Indien - UR - Université de La Réunion

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Several recent finance articles employ the Omega measure, proposed by Keating and Shadwick (2002) - defined as a ratio of potential gains out of possible losses - for gauging the performance of funds or active strategies (e.g. Eling and Schuhmacher, 2007; Farinelli and Tibiletti, 2008; Annaert et al., 2009; Bertrand and Prigent, 2011; Zieling et al., 2014; Kapsos et al., 2014; Hamidi et al., 2014), in substitution of the traditional Sharpe ratio (1966), with the arguments that return distributions are not Gaussian and volatility is not, always, the relevant risk metric. Other authors also use the same criterion for optimizing (non-linear) portfolios with important downside risk. However, we wonder in this article about the relevance of such approaches. First, we show through a basic illustration that the Omega ratio is inconsistent with the Strict Inferior Second-order Stochastic Dominance criterion. Furthermore, we observe that the trade-off between return and risk, corresponding to the Omega measure, may be essentially influenced by the mean return. Next, we illustrate in static and dynamic frameworks that Omega-based optimal portfolios can be associated with traditional optimization paradigms depending on the chosen threshold used in the computation of Omega. Finally, we present some robustness checks on long-only asset and hedge fund databases that all confirm our general results.

Keywords: Omega; Performance Measure; Return Distribution; Risk; Stochastic Dominance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in [Research Report] ID 2559216, Social Science Research Network. 2016

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: On the (Ab)use of Omega? (2018)
Working Paper: On the (Ab)use of Omega? (2018)
Working Paper: On the (Ab)use of Omega ? (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01697640

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().