EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Lawyer Fee Arrangements and Litigation Outcomes: An Auction-Theoretic Perspective

Yannick Gabuthy () and Pierre-Henri Morand ()
Additional contact information
Yannick Gabuthy: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Many jurisdictions in Europe foresee the opportunity to allow the use of pay-for-performance (outcome-based) contracts in lawyer-client relationships, via the socalled contingent/conditional fees. In this article, we analyze the welfare implications of such fee regimes – regarding their effects on litigation outcomes – by modeling the lawsuit as an auction. The criteria for regime comparison are litigation costs, lawyers' profits, and parties' incentives to reach a pre-trial settlement. The main result shows that switching from hourly to outcome-based fees may increase the trial costs and the lawyers' profits, and enhance the likelihood of settlement (by decreasing the litigants' expected utilities at trial). This last effect may challenge an important argument in favor of pay-for-performance contracts, that is the objective of promoting access to justice, which is an overriding public policy motivation behind the introduction of these remuneration systems.

Keywords: Litigation expenditures; Pre-trial settlement; Legal fees (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-01-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01973660v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01973660v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Lawyer Fee Arrangements and Litigation Outcomes: An Auction-Theoretic Perspective (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01973660

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01973660