How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task?
Fabien Perez (),
Radu Vranceanu () and
Additional contact information
Fabien Perez: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique
Delphine Dubart: ESSEC Business School - Essec Business School
Working Papers from HAL
This paper uses the test/retest data from the Holt and Laury (2002) experiment to provide estimates of the measurement error in this popular risk-aversion task. Maximum likelihood estimation suggests that the variance of the measurement error is approximately equal to the variance of the number of safe choices. Simulations confirm that the coefficient on the risk measure in univariate OLS regressions is approximately half of its true value. Unlike measurement error, the discrete transformation of continuous riskaversion is not a major issue. We discuss the merits of a number of different solutions: increasing the number of observations, IV and the ORIV method developed by Gillen et al. (2019).
Keywords: ORIV; Experiments; Measurement error; Risk-aversion; Test/retest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-rmg and nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-essec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02291224
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task? (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02291224
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().