Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-Environmental Schemes?

Douadia Bougherara, Margaux Lapierre (), Raphaële Préget () and Alexandre Sauquet
Additional contact information
Margaux Lapierre: CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Nearly all Agri-Environmental Schemes (AES) offer stable annual payments over theduration of the contract. Yet AES are often intended to be a transition tool, designed totrigger changes in farming practices rather than to support them indefinitely. A decreasingsequence of payments thus appears particularly attractive as a reward structure for AES.The standard discounted utility model supports this notion by predicting that individualsshould prefer a decreasing sequence of payments if the total sum of outcomes is con-stant. Nevertheless, the literature shows that numerous mechanisms, such as increasingproductivity, anticipatory pleasure, and loss aversion, can, by contrast, incline individualsto favor an increasing sequence of payments. To understand the preferences of farmersfor different payment sequences, we propose a review of the mechanisms highlighted bythe literature in psychology and economics. We then test farmers' preferences for stable,increasing or decreasing payments through a choice experiment (CE) survey. In this sur-vey, farmers are offered hypothetical contracts rewarding the planting of cover crops. Toreduce hypothetical bias, the choice cards were designed following repeated interactionswith local stakeholders. One hundred twenty-three French farmers, about 15% of thosecontacted, responded to the survey. Overall, farmers do not present a clear willingnessto depart from the usual stable payments. Nevertheless, 17% declare a preference for in-creasing sequences of payment. Moreover, we find a significant rejection of decreasingpayments by farmers with a lower discount rate or farmers more willing to take risks thanthe median farmer, contradicting the discounted utility model

Keywords: Choice experiment; Cover crops; Farming practices; Sequences of outcomes; Agri-Environmental Schemes; Discounted utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-10-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-dcm, nep-env, nep-exp and nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02892858v2
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02892858v2/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-environmental schemes? (2021)
Working Paper: Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-Environmental Schemes? (2021)
Working Paper: Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-Environmental Schemes? (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02892858

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().