EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Good Securitization, Bad Securitization

Guillaume Plantin ()
Additional contact information
Guillaume Plantin: UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse, Tepper School of Business - CMU - Carnegie Mellon University [Pittsburgh]

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: I use a simple banking model to study the circumstances under which excessive and inefficient securitization may occur. I first stress that increasing securitization rates that reduce banks' incentives to screen borrowers and thus lead to more defaults need not be inefficient. This may be an efficient response to higher gains from trade between banks and fixed-income markets in the presence of bank moral hazard. I then argue that if reaping such higher gains from trade induces a reduction in the informational efficiency of the securitization market, then there is room for excessive securitization. The model points at increased transparency and informational efficiency of the securitization market as key improvements for the future of the banking system.

Keywords: Banking; Securitization; Liquidity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-02-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03476052v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03476052v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03476052

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03476052